Redundancy and Helly

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Redundancy and Helly

The classical Helly’s Theorem about finite sets of convex sets is given an unusually simple proof based on a ‘Redundancy Lemma’. Because the proof is topological it extends immediately to a Helly’s Theorem for the well-known combinatorial topology representation of oriented matroids which is reviewed. The same proof is then used to strengthen Helly’s Theorem in a useful way relative to the Fark...

متن کامل

Faster recognition of clique-Helly and hereditary clique-Helly graphs

A family of subsets of a set is Helly when every subfamily of it, which is formed by pairwise intersecting subsets contains a common element. A graph G is cliqueHelly when the family of its (maximal) cliques is Helly, while G is hereditary clique-Helly when every induced subgraph of it is clique-Helly. The best algorithms currently known to recognize clique-Helly and hereditary clique-Helly gra...

متن کامل

Helly Numbers of Polyominoes

We define the Helly number of a polyomino P as the smallest number h such that the h-Helly property holds for the family of symmetric and translated copies of P on the integer grid. We prove the following: (i) the only polyominoes with Helly number 2 are the rectangles, (ii) there does not exist any polyomino with Helly number 3, (iii) there exist polyminoes of Helly number k for any k 6= 1, 3.

متن کامل

Biclique-Helly Graphs

A graph is biclique-Helly when its family of (maximal) bicliques is a Helly family. We describe characterizations for biclique-Helly graphs, leading to polynomial time recognition algorithms. In addition, we relate biclique-Helly graphs to the classes of clique-Helly, disk-Helly and neighborhood-Helly graphs.

متن کامل

Helly Property for Subtrees1

One can prove the following proposition (1) For every non empty finite sequence p holds 〈p(1)〉 aa p = p. Let p, q be finite sequences. The functor maxPrefix(p, q) yields a finite sequence and is defined by: (Def. 1) maxPrefix(p, q) p and maxPrefix(p, q) q and for every finite sequence r such that r p and r q holds r maxPrefix(p, q). Let us observe that the functor maxPrefix(p, q) is commutative...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: European Journal of Combinatorics

سال: 2001

ISSN: 0195-6698

DOI: 10.1006/eujc.2000.0487